Harrington

Harrington v. Equity Asset & Property Management, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20203:18-cv-00216California6,363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BLAINE G. HARRINGTON III, Case No.: 3:18-cv-00216-GPC-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR THIRD DEFAULT

JUDGMENT

EQUITY ASSET & PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT, INC. d/b/a EQUITY [ECF No. 27]

RESIDENCE, LLC,

15 Defendant.

17 Before the Court is the motion for Third Default Judgment filed by Plaintiff Blaine 18 G. Harrington III. ECF No. 27. Defendant Equity Asset & Property Management, Inc. 19 d/b/a Equity Residences LLC has not answered Plaintiff’s complaint or otherwise 20 appeared in this matter. For the reasons discussed below the Court GRANTS 21 Harrington’s motion.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

23 On January 30, 2018, Harrington filed his Complaint in this Court. ECF No. 1. 24 According to the Return of Service filed on February 8, 2018, the summons and 25 complaint were served on “Jason Smith as Manager” at Equity’s address of 1220 26 Rosecrans Street, #822, San Diego, CA, 92016 (“Rosecrans Street address”). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.