Cunningham

Cunningham v. Hot Tub Cruisin, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20203:19-cv-00874California988 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES CUNNINGHAM, Case No. 19-cv-00874-BAS-KSC

Plaintiff, ORDER:

15 1. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

HOT TUB CRUISIN, INC., FILE FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT (ECF No. 15);

AND

Defendant. 2. GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

FILE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT (ECF No. 16) 21 Plaintiff James Cunningham filed suit against Defendant Hot Tub Cruisin, Inc. (“HTC”), alleging he suffered a severe hand injury while aboard a “hot tub boat” in San Diego’s Mission Bay. (Compl. ¶ 3, ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s Complaint pleads claims against HTC for: (1) negligence, (2) design and manufacturing defect, (3) strict products liability — failure to warn of defective condition, (4) negligent products liability, and (5) liability to passengers under 46 U.S.C. § 30102. (Id. ¶¶ 24– I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.