Stewart
Stewart v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Lindsey Stewart, Case No.: 19cv1780-CAB-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS
v. TO DISMISS AND STRIKE [Doc. Nos. 5 and 7] Chick-Fil-A, et al, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Lindsey Stewart (“Plaintiff”), a non-prisoner, proceeding pro se, has filed 17 a complaint for employment discrimination. [Doc. No. 1.] On November 6, 2019, 18 Defendants Danny Putnam, Becky Putnam, and 3 Little Cows, Inc. dba Chick-Fil-A filed 19 a motion to dismiss the complaint and to strike certain portions of the complaint. [Doc. 20 No. 5.] On November 25, 2019, Defendant Chick-Fil-A, Inc. also filed a motion to 21 dismiss the complaint. [Doc. No. 7.] On December 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed oppositions 22 to both motions. [Doc. Nos. 17, 18.] On January 10, 2020, Defendants filed replies to 23 the oppositions. [Doc. Nos. 19 and 20.] The Court deems the motions suitable for 24 determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR…