Arbmetrics, LLC v. Dexcom Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20193:18-cv-00134California6,697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARBMETRICS, LLC, an Ohio limited Case No.: 18-CV-134 JLS (KSC) liability company,

ORDER ON CLAIM

Plaintiff, CONSTRUCTION v.

DEXCOM, INC., a Delaware corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Arbmetrics, LLC’s (“Pl.’s Br.,” ECF No. 66) and Defendant Dexcom, Inc.’s (“Def.’s Br.,” ECF No. 123) Opening Claim Construction Briefs, as well as each Party’s response to the other’s Opening Brief (“Def.’s Resp.,” ECF No. 68; “Pl.’s Resp.,” ECF No. 69). The parties dispute the meaning of seven terms claimed by U.S. Patent No. 6,343,225 (the “’225 Patent”). The Court heard oral argument, including tutorials from the Parties, on October 31, 2019. See ECF No. 77. Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments, the evidence, and the law, the Court rules as follows. LEGAL STANDARD “A determination of infringement involves a two-step analysis. ‘First, the claim must be properly construed to determine its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.