Vernon

Vernon v. Tesla Energy

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20203:19-cv-02356California1,024 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK E. VERNON, Case No.: 19cv2356-JAH (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S TESLA ENERGY; TESLA ENERGY

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

OPERATIONS, INC.; SOLARCITY

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

CORP., ROE CORPORATIONS,

[DOC. NO. 2]; AND PARTNERSHIPS OR OTHER

BUSINESS ENTITIES 1-10, Inclusive, 2. DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)

19 On December 10, 2019, Mark E. Vernon (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a 20 complaint along with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), pursuant to 21 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Doc. No. 2. After a careful review of the record and for the reasons 22 set forth below, the Court (1) GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed IFP, [Doc. 23 No. 2]; and (2) DISMISSES the complaint, [Doc. No. 1], without prejudice for lack of 24 subject matter jurisdiction.

I. Plaintiff’s IFP Motion

26 All parties instituting any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.