Spatcher

Spatcher v. Baird

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20203:19-cv-01936California435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY LEON SPATCHER, Case No. 19-cv-01936-BAS (MSB) CDCR #BJ-9222,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILING TO STATE

A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

v. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND § 1915A(b) AND

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

NORI BAIRD; TRI CITY MEDICAL

CENTER; OCEANSIDE POLICE

DEP’T, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Gregory Spatcher, currently housed at the California Institution for Men located in Chino, California, and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 4, 2019. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) On October 24, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) but dismissed his Complaint for failing to state any claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b). (See ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was advised of his pleading deficiencies and granted 45 days leave in which to file an Amended Complaint that fixed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.