McMorrow

McMorrow v. Mondelez International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20203:17-cv-02327California1,702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 PATRICK MCMORROW, et al., Case No. 17-cv-2327-BAS-JLB 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO SEAL

v. (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO SEAL

(3) GRANTING IN PART

MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO

SEAL

INC.,

[ECF No. 71, 84, 103] Defendant.

Presently before the Court are three motions by the parties to file documents under seal. (ECF Nos. 71, 84, 103.) The Court analyzes each motion in turn. I. LEGAL STANDARD “[T]he courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). “Unless a particular court record is one ‘traditionally kept secret,’ a ‘strong presumption in favor of access’ is the 2006) (citing Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.