Jones
Jones v. Madden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Ryan JONES, Case No.: 18-cv-2173-LAB-AGS Petitioner, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
TO GRANT PETITIONER’S
v.
UNOPPOSED MOTIONS FOR
Raymond MADDEN, Warden WITHDRAWAL AND ABEYANCE (ECF Nos. 12 & 14) Respondent. 15 On September 28, 2018, the Court notified petitioner Ryan Jones that his habeas corpus petition was deficient because it contained both exhausted and unexhausted claims. (ECF No. 2, at 2.) Specifically, Jones failed to present Claims 3- to the California Supreme Court. (Id.) To remedy this defect, Jones moves to withdraw Claims 3-6 until he fully exhausts those claims in state court and to stay this federal case until that exhaustion is finalized. The Warden did not respond to or oppose these motions. To achieve a “withdrawal and abeyance,” a petitioner must (1) voluntarily withdraw his unexhausted claims, (2) ask the Court to stay the proceedings and hold the petition’s fully-exhausted portion…