Rasuwl

Rasuwl v. Hays

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20203:19-cv-01832California445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALMALIK RASUWL, Case No. 3:19-cv-01832-MMA-WVG

CDCR #BK-0601,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILING TO STATE vs. A CLAIM PURSUANT 14 TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND

MARK HAYS; FRANK CLAMSER;

§ 1915A(b) AND FOR FAILING

APRIL SIPPERLEY; JUSTIN WHITE,

TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE

Defendants. WITH COURT ORDER REQUIRING AMENDMENT 18 19 Plaintiff Almalik Rasuwl, currently housed at Valley State Prison located in Chowchilla, California, and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 23, 2019. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. I. Procedural History On October 29, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but dismissed his Complaint for failing to state any claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.