Vinck

Vinck v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20203:19-cv-00715-W-LRCalifornia4,579 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Rosemary Guadalupe V. (‘Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c) seeking judicial review of the final decision of the 26 27 ' Andrew M. Saul became Commissioner of Social Security on June 17, 2019 and is therefore substituted for Nancy A. Berryhill as Defendant. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fed R. Civ. P. 25(d).

|}Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Defendant” or “Commissioner’”) 2 || denying Plaintiffs application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security ||Income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act’”). (Doc. 1.) Before Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15); Defendant’s Cross- ||Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary 6 || Judgment (Doc. 18); and Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment \|(Doc. 20). The parties consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (See Gen. Or. 707; Doc. 5.) After a thorough review of the papers on file, the Administrative Record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.