Eischen

Eischen v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20203:19-cv-00804California4,301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUDY SUMI ITO E., Case No.: 3:19CV804-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF AND

v. DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTIONS

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 On May 5, 2019, plaintiff Judy Sumi Ito E. filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. (Doc. No. 1.) Now pending before the Court and ready for decision are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The case is remanded to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with this Order. / / I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On August 4,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.