Irizarry

Irizarry v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20203:19-cv-00476California3,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AIDA I., Case No.: 3:19-cv-00476-AJB-RNB Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION REGARDING

CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

JUDGMENT

Social Security,1 15 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 21, 22) 16 17 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Anthony G. Battaglia, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Civil Local Rule 72.1(c) of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. On March 12, 2019, plaintiff filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits, and for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The operative complaint is the First Amended Complaint filed by plaintiff on March 26, 2019. (See ECF No. 6.) 26 27 Andrew Saul is hereby…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.