Battensby

Battensby v. Zhang

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20203:20-cv-00001-TWR-MDDCalifornia3,505 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:20-cv-0001-BAS-MDD

DAVID BATTENSBY,

CDCR # AC-8920, ORDER:

13 Plaintiff, 1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 14 v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

RONALD ZHANG; M. SOUSLEY; S.

§ 1915(a) (ECF No. 2) ROBERTS, M.D.; S. GATES, Chief,

Defendants. 2) DISMISSING DEFENDANTS

SOUSLEY, ROBERTS, AND GATES

18 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

21 22 Plaintiff David Battensby, incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff claims that Defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by discontinuing Plaintiff’s morphine prescription and denying his grievance and subsequent appeals. (See id. at 3–5.) Plaintiff did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.