Vista Capital Investments, LLC v. Natural Shrimp, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20203:19-cv-01302California2,969 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VISTA CAPITAL Case No.: 19-cv-1302-WQH-BGS

INVESTMENTS, LLC,

ORDER

Plaintiff, 9 v.

NATURAL SHRIMP, INC.,

11 Defendants. 12 HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint filed by Defendant Natural Shrimp, Inc. (ECF No. 6). I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On April 30, 2019, Plaintiff Vista Capital Investments, LLC (“Vista”), filed a complaint against Defendant Natural Shrimp, Inc. (“Natural Shrimp”), in state court in Dallas, Texas (the “Dallas Complaint”). Vista Capital Investments, LLC v. Natural Shrimp, Inc., No. DC-19-06160. Vista alleged one cause of action against Natural Shrimp for breach of a Warrant under which Vista alleged it was entitled to acquire 16,052,090 shares of Natural Shrimp’s common stock. On July 3, 2019, Natural Shrimp filed a motion to dismiss the Dallas Complaint. Natural Shrimp contended that the Dallas state court lacked jurisdiction “because the document that the Plaintiff seeks to enforce has a forum…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.