Schwerdtfeger

Schwerdtfeger v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20203:19-cv-02255California3,804 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL JOSEPH Case No.: 19-CV-2255 JLS (JLB)

SCHWERDTFEGER,

CDCR #P‒70401, ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA Plaintiff,

PAUPERIS, (2) DISMISSING

14 vs. DEFENDANT PARAMO PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) AND

1915A(b)(1), AND (3) DIRECTING 16 PARAMO, Warden; R. BUCKEL, Assoc. U.S. MARSHAL TO EFFECT Warden Business Services; UNKNOWN SERVICE UPON DEFENDANT R. CDCR AGENT, Supervisor of Plant BUCKEL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 18 Operations, § 1915(d) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3) Defendants. (ECF No. 2)

Plaintiff Michael Joseph Schwerdtfeger, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at the California Health Care Facility (“CHCF”) in Stockton, California, has filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1), together with a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (“Mot.,” ECF No. 2). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.