Hilsley
Hilsley v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL HILSLEY, and WILLIAM Case No.: 17cv2335-GPC(MDD) RILEY, on behalf of themselves and all 12 others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING PROPOSED INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO Plaintiff,
INTERVENE
14 v. [Dkt. No. 233.]
OCEAN SPRAY CRANBERRIES, INC.;
ARNOLD WORLDWIDE LLC; and DOES defendants 1 through 5, inclusive, 17 Defendants.
19 Before the Court is Proposed Intervenors Michael Froio and Mikhail Surman’s 20 motion to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) and 24(b)(1)(B). 21 (Dkt. No. 233.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition. (Dkt. No. 235.) Defendant Ocean Spray 22 filed a non-opposition to the motion to intervene based on the Proposed Intervenors’ 23 representation that they will not obstruct the settlement. (Dkt. No. 236.) Proposed 24 Intervenors filed a reply. (Dkt. No. 237.) A hearing was held on January 23, 2020. (Dkt. 25 No. 239.) Ronald Marron, Esq., Michael Houchin, Esq., David Elliott, Esq. and Lilach 26…