Garrison

Garrison v. Ringgold

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20203:19-cv-00244California939 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY GARRISON, an individual, and Case No.: 19cv244-GPC(RBB) CHRISTINE GARRISON, an individual ,

ORDER SUA SPONTE VACATING

Plaintiffs, DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST v. DEFENDANTS ROSEGOLD

INVESTMENTS, LLP AND MASTER

REGINALD BUDDY RINGGOLD, III

INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. aka Rasool Abdul Rahim El, an individual, ROSEGOLD INVESTMENTS, LLP, a Delaware 17 Partnership, and MASTER INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., a California Corporation, 19 Defendants.

21 On September 25, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for default 22 judgment against Defendants Rosegold Investments, LLP (“Rosegold”) and Master 23 Investment Group, Inc. (“MIG”) as to liability. (Dkt. No. 36.) Upon the Court’s review, 24 it sua sponte vacates the default judgment entered against Rosegold and MIG. See Fed. 25 R. Civ. P. 55(c) (court “may set aside a final default judgment under Rule 60(b)”; Fed. R. 26 Civ. P. 60(b). 27 / / / 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.