Garrison
Garrison v. Ringgold
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY GARRISON, an individual, and Case No.: 19cv244-GPC(RBB) CHRISTINE GARRISON, an individual ,
ORDER SUA SPONTE VACATING
Plaintiffs, DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST v. DEFENDANTS ROSEGOLD
INVESTMENTS, LLP AND MASTER
REGINALD BUDDY RINGGOLD, III
INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. aka Rasool Abdul Rahim El, an individual, ROSEGOLD INVESTMENTS, LLP, a Delaware 17 Partnership, and MASTER INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., a California Corporation, 19 Defendants.
21 On September 25, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for default 22 judgment against Defendants Rosegold Investments, LLP (“Rosegold”) and Master 23 Investment Group, Inc. (“MIG”) as to liability. (Dkt. No. 36.) Upon the Court’s review, 24 it sua sponte vacates the default judgment entered against Rosegold and MIG. See Fed. 25 R. Civ. P. 55(c) (court “may set aside a final default judgment under Rule 60(b)”; Fed. R. 26 Civ. P. 60(b). 27 / / / 28 …