Wright

Wright v. Old Gringo, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20203:17-cv-01996California3,827 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARSHA WRIGHT, Case No.: 17cv1996-BAS (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE

v. MOTION TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING

ORDER

OLD GRINGO, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF NO. 209] 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Ex Parte Motion to Amend Scheduling Order and Extend or Vacate Remaining Pretrial and Trial-Related Deadlines and Dates” (“Instant Motion”), filed on January 8, 2020. (See ECF No. 209.) Defendants filed their Opposition on January 9, 2020. (ECF No. 210.) The Court finds this motion suitable for ruling on the papers pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 (d). For the reasons discussed in this Order, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a former designer for Defendants Old Gringo, Inc. (“OGI”) and Old Gringo, S.A. de C.V. (“OGS”) (a Western wear manufacturer and distributor and its Mexican sister company,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.