Puccio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH PUCCIO and MARCIA Case No.: 16-cv-02890 W (BGS)

PUCCIO,

ORDER:

Plaintiffs, 13 v. GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

FRANKLIN J. LOVE, and CMRE MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

FINANCIAL SERVICES,

AND LITIGATION EXPENSES

16 Defendants. [DOC. 56] 17 18 19 20 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees [Doc. 56]. The Court decides the matters without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees and litigation expenses. // // 27 28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Joseph and Marcia Puccio brought this action on November 23, 2016, alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“RFDCPA”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1788 et seq. (Compl. [Doc. 1].) On December 28, 2016,…