Ruano

Ruano v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20203:16-cv-01928California2,220 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENRIQUE RUANO, Civil Case No.: 16cv1928-JAH Criminal Case No.: 10cr2247-JAH Petitioner, v. ORDER: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (1) DENYING PETITIONER’S Respondent. MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) 16 AS MOOT (Doc. No. 25); 17 (2) DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO VACATE

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255

20 (Doc. No. 29) 21 INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Enrique Ruano’s (“Petitioner”) pro se motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to § 3582(c), (Doc. No. 25), and motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, (Doc. No. 29). Respondent United States of America filed a Response in Opposition to Petitioner’s section 2255 motion. Doc. No. 34. Having thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing, the relevant 28 record, the Court DENIES as moot…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.