Thomas
Thomas v. State Farm General Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sarah Aislinn Flynn Thomas, Case No. 18-cv-00728-BAS-BGS 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: 12 v. (1) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION [ECF No. 39]; State Farm Insurance Company, (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S EX Defendant. PARTE MOTION AS MOOT [ECF No. 40]; AND (3) DIRECTING THE CLERK TO
ENTER JUDGMENT
17 On January 7, 2020, the Court issued a Supplemental Order tentatively granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to the good faith and fair dealing claim but permitting Plaintiff to object. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff timely objected on January 15, 2020 on the basis that, under Rule 56, she “should be allowed to discover whether State Farm decided unreasonably to not apply the statutes to the policies here.” (Plf.’s Obj. at 1, ECF No. 39.) Plaintiff argues that “State Farm could have suspected that the statutes applied to …