Losito
Losito v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES LOSITO, Case No.: 20-CV-143-WVG
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS
ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of
Social Security, [Doc. No. 2.] Defendant. 16
18 Plaintiff files for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the Complaint. (Doc. No. 2.) The Court reviews Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), as required when a plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court finds that the Complaint sufficiently states a claim for relief. Thus, the Court GRANTS the IFP motion. I. MOTION FOR IFP Plaintiff moves to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a…