Mitek Systems, Inc. v. Urban Ft, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20203:19-cv-01432California680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MITEK SYSTEMS, INC., Case No.: 19-CV-1432-CAB-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. SET ASIDE DEFAULT AND

DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT

URBAN FT (NORTH AMERICA), LLC,

JUDGMENT

aka URBAN FT, LLC, 15 Defendant. [Doc. Nos. 29, 30]

18 Plaintiff Mitek Systems, Inc. filed its complaint in this action on July 31, 2019 [Doc. No. 1], and thereafter filed its first amended complaint (“FAC”) on August 15, 2019. [Doc. No. 8.] On September 25, 2019, Defendant Urban FT (North America), LLC, aka Urban FT, LLC filed its answer to the FAC. [Doc. No. 16.] On October 31, 2019, Defendant’s previous counsel of record, Patrick D. Paschall, Esq., filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. [Doc. No. 18.] Due to the lack of any opposition, the Court granted the motion to withdraw as counsel on November 26, 2019. [Doc. No. 23.] The Court reminded Defendant that it cannot proceed without representation pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.3(j)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.