Raiser

Raiser v. Casserly

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20203:18-cv-01836California863 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON RAISER, Case No.: 18-CV-1836 JLS (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S

PENDING EX PARTE MOTIONS

HON. TIMOTHY CASSERLY, et al.,

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 28, 34, 40, 50, 51) 16 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Aaron Raiser’s Ex Parte Motions (A) for an Order Declaring ECF Access Policies and Local Rule 7.1 Unconstitutional (ECF No. 28); (B) for an Order Declaring Local Rule 7.1 Page Limit Unconstitutional (ECF No. 34); (C) for Order of Entry of Default Judgment (ECF No. 40); (D) for an Order (1) That Only Presiding Judge Personally Read All Pending and Future Applications, Motions and Memorandum of Points and Authorities and Personally Draft The Orders Thereon With No Staff Input; (2) That Certain Administrative Orders Be Entered To Prevent Further Bias and Disruption To Proceedings And Case Transferred To Another Judge; (3) For Hearing To Get …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.