Emrit

Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20203:20-cv-00060California766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Case No.: 20cv0060 DMS (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

HORUS MUSIC VIDEO

AND (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

DISTRIBUTION, et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR Defendants. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE

GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)

19 Plaintiff, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, has submitted a Complaint along with a request to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.