Altamirano

Johnson v. Altamirano

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20203:19-cv-01185California8,514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 ANTHONY JOHNSON, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01185-H-BLM 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER:

13 v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MANUEL ALTAMIRANO, an

MOTION FOR

individual; RICHARD TURNER, an

RECONSIDERATION;

individual; DAVID KINNEY, an 16 individual; DAVID HUFFMAN, an [Doc. No. 74.] individual; PAUL TYRELL, an

individual; SEAN SULLIVAN, an (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S individual; STORIX, INC., a California

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF RULE

corporation; and DOES 1-5, inclusive, 54(b) PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT Defendants. OR FOR § 1292(b)

CERTIFICATION; AND

[Doc. No. 75.]

23 (3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS ALTAMIRANO, HUFFMAN,

KINNEY, AND TURNER’S MOTION

TO STAY

26 [Doc. No. 78.]

28 On December 9, 2019, Plaintiff Anthony Johnson filed (1) a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s December 2, 2019 order on Defendants’ motions to dismiss and anti-SLAPP motions to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.