Copenhaver

Copenhaver v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20203:18-cv-00790California453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA C., Case No.: 18-cv-00790-AJB-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 24); Defendant. 16 (2) GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 18 21); 19 (3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S

CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 22.); AND

22 (4) REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

25 Presently before the Court are: (1) Plaintiff Laura Joyce Copenhaver’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 21); and (2) Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Defendant”) cross-motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 22). The Court |/referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin for a Report and 2 || Recommendation (the “R&R”), which was issued on January 2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.