Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Scripps Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20203:19-cv-02459California716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCELLA RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 19cv2459-DMS-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

SCRIPPS HEALTH,

AND (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

Defendant. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE

GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)

19 Plaintiff, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, has submitted a Complaint along with a request to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.