1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PIER 32 MARINA, a California Limited Case No.: 19cv1495-MMA (AGS) 11 Liability Company, dba PIER 32 MARINA,

IN ADMIRALTY

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 13 v. INTERLOCUTORY VESSEL SALE

AND AUTHORIZATION TO

14 S/V LORENA GRAYCE, U.S.C.G. CREDIT BID Official No. 681700, AND ALL OF HER 15 ENGINES, TACKLE, ACCESSORIES, [Doc. No. 14]

EQUIPMENT, FURNISHINGS AND

16 APPURTENANCES, in rem, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 On November 20, 2019, Plaintiff PIER 32 MARINA, LLC, d/b/a PIER 32 22 MARINA’s (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant, unopposed motion for interlocutory vessel sale 23 and authorization to credit bid. See Doc. No. 14. Plaintiff argues that Defendant Vessel, 24 known as S/V LORENA GRAYCE, U.S.C.G. Official No. 681700, should be sold to 25 preserve its value because Defendant Vessel is liable to deterioration while in custody, 26 the cost of keeping Defendant Vessel in custody is excessive, and there has been an 27 unreasonable delay in securing the vessel. 28 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that upon application of a party 1 having custody of the subject property, the Court may order the property sold if the 2 property is liable to deterioration while in custody pending the action, “the expense of 3 keeping the property is excessive or disproportionate,” or if “there is an unreasonable 4 delay in securing the release of the property.” Fed. R. Civ. P. Supp. R. E(9)(a).1 5 Plaintiff submits a declaration from Ray Jones, who opines that all vessels 6 inevitably deteriorate over time. See Doc. No. 14-3 (hereinafter “Jones Decl.”) ¶ 2. 7 Jones declares that this is especially true when the vessel sits idle in a salt water 8 environment and her engines and other equipment are not regularly operated. See id. 9 Accordingly, the Court finds that Defendant Vessel is liable to deterioration while 10 pending custody in this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. Supp. R. E(9)(a). 11 Plaintiff also moves for interlocutory sale of Defendant Vessel on the ground that 12 the cost of keeping Defendant Vessel in custody is excessive. The authorized costs 13 associated with detaining and maintaining Defendant Vessel are accruing at a rate of 14 approximately $4,515.00 per month. See Doc. No. 14-2 at 8. Jones has concluded that 15 the fair market value of the Defendant Vessel at public auction will likely not exceed 16 $58,000. See id. at 7. Plaintiff claims that there has been no prospect that anyone will 17 post a bond or other adequate security to effect the release of the Defendant Vessel. See 18 id. at 8. Plaintiff argues that as a result of the vessel remaining in custody, unavoidable 19 custodial expenses continue to accrue that could otherwise be used to satisfy maritime 20 lien claims. “Maintenance costs of several thousand dollars per month, particularly 21 where [no attempt has been made] to answer Plaintiff’s Complaint or secure the Vessel’s 22 release, are excessive and disproportionate.” Vineyard Bank v. M/Y Elizabeth I, U.S.C.G. 23 Official No. 1130283, No. 08CV2044 BTM WMC, 2009 WL 799304, at *2 (S.D. Cal. 24 Mar. 23, 2009). Accordingly, the Court finds that the cost of keeping Defendant Vessel 25 in custody is excessive. 26

27 1 The Court notes that Plaintiff appears to cite to an outdated, but materially indistinguishable, 28 1 Plaintiff further contends that interlocutory sale is appropriate because there has 2 been no attempt to secure the release of Defendant Vessel. Defendant Vessel was 3 arrested in August 2019. Default was entered on November 7, 2019. See Doc. No. 13. 4 There has been no attempt since that time to secure the release of Defendant Vessel. See 5 Fed. R. Civ. P. Supp. R. E(5) (concerning release of property). Accordingly, the Court 6 finds that finds that there has been an unreasonable delay in securing the release of 7 Defendant Vessel. 8 CONCLUSION 9 Based on the foregoing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for interlocutory 10 vessel sale as follows: 11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, consistent with Supplemental Admiralty Rule 12 E(9) and Local Admiralty Rule E.1(e) the United States Marshal be and hereby is 13 directed and empowered to sell said DEFENDANT VESSEL and her engines, tackle, 14 accessories, equipment, furnishings and appurtenances, as is, where is, at public sale at 15 the first available time and date, after having first caused notice of said sale to be 16 published daily in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of San Diego, 17 California for at least seven days immediately before the date of sale; and 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that such public notice specify the date, time and 19 location for the sale of the DEFENDANT VESSEL; and 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, consistent with Local Admiralty Rule 21 E.1(e)(2), such public notice specify that the last and highest bidder at the sale will be 22 required to deposit with the U.S. Marshal a certified check or a cashier’s check in the 23 amount of the full purchase price not to exceed $500, and otherwise $500 or ten percent 24 (10%) of the bid, whichever is greater, and that the balance, if any, of the purchase price 25 shall be paid by certified check or cashier’s check before confirmation of the sale or 26 within three days of dismissal of any opposition which may have been filed, exclusive of 27 Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays; and 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any proceeds of said sale shall be held by it or 1 || deposited by the United States Marshal in the Registry of this Court, pending further 2 || Order of this Court; and 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff, having a secured maritime lien 4 |/interest in the Defendant Vessel pursuant to the Commercial Instruments and Federal 5 || Maritime Lien Act (46 U.S.C. section 31301, et seq.) and being the only claimant in this 6 || action asserting a maritime claim against her, is authorized pursuant to Local Admiralty 7 E.1(e)(2) to credit bid at the auction of the DEFENDANT VESSEL, without 8 || payment of cash, a sum equal to its secured interest in the Defendant Vessel, consisting 9 || of the lien amount specified in PLAINTIFF’s Verified Complaint ($124,196.40), plus its 10 || actual costs of suit through the date of the sale, including U.S. Marshal and other custodia 11 expenses, with such costs and expenses to be calculated at the rates specified and 12 || authorized in the Order Appointing Substitute Custodian and Authorizing Movement of 13 ||Defendant Vessel. However, as Plaintiff’?s maritime necessaries lien interest in the 14 |} DEFENDANT VESSEL does not, as a matter of law, include attorneys’ fees, such fees 15 not to be included in any credit bid Plaintiff makes; and 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Local Supplemental Admiralty Rule 17 || E.1(e)(2), that if within three days of the auction date, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, 18 || and legal holidays, no written objection is filed, the sale shall stand confirmed as of 19 || course, without the necessity of any affirmative action thereon by a judge, except that no 20 shall stand confirmed until the buyer has complied fully with the terms of the 21 || purchase. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: February 6, 2020 26 Mitek. M={ hipllr

HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO

38 United States District Judge