Morrison

Morrison v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20203:18-cv-01857-MMA-JLBCalifornia658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN MICHAEL MORRISON, Case No.: 18cv1857-MMA (JLB)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

Petitioner, RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED v. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; 13 JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, et al., [Doc. No. 18]

DENYING RESPONDENT’S

Respondents. MOTION TO DISMISS;

[Doc. No. 12]

GRANTING PETITIONER’S

RENEWED REQUEST FOR A STAY

AND ABEYANCE

19 20 Petitioner Ryan Michael Morrison (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus (the “Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Doc. No. 1. Two months later, Petitioner filed a motion for stay and abeyance pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). See Doc. No. 4. The Court adopted the report and recommendation of the assigned magistrate judge and denied Petitioner’s motion for stay and abeyance without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.