Siegel

Siegel v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20203:18-cv-02493California3,426 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 JOSHUA SIEGEL, Case No.: 18-cv-02493-WQH-BGS

Petitioner,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION RE MOTION

TO DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT

Robert Neuschmid; Xavier Becerra The

OF HABEAS CORPUS

Attorney General of the State of 18 California, [ECF No. 6] 19 Respondent.

Petitioner Joshua Siegel (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254, challenging his 2014 conviction in San Diego County Superior Court case number SCD248328. (ECF No. 1.) Respondent Robert Neuschmid (“Respondent”) moves to dismiss the Petition contending the Petition is untimely. (ECF No. 6.) Petitioner 26 1 The Court cites the CM/ECF pagination when referencing the Petition and attached exhibits (ECF No. 1) and Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6). It cites to internal 28 did not file an opposition. (See docket.) This Report and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.