Pelletier

Pacer Construction Holdings Corporation v. Pelletier

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20203:19-cv-01263California3,758 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PACER CONSTRUCTION HOLDINGS Case No.: 19cv1263-MMA (BGS) CORPORATION,

ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT

RICHARD PELLETIER HOLDINGS, Petitioner, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. PETITION

RICHARD PELLETIER; and RICHARD [Doc. No. 9]

PELLETIER HOLDINGS, INC.,

Respondents. 17 On July 9, 2019, Petitioner Pacer Construction Holdings Corporation (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition against Respondents Richard Pelletier (“Pelletier”) and Richard Pelletier Holdings, Inc. (“RPHI”) (collectively, “Respondents”) to confirm two arbitration awards dated March 13, 2019 and May 22, 2019. See Doc. No. 1 (hereinafter “Petition”). RPHI moves to dismiss the Petition for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). See Doc. No. 9. Petitioner filed an opposition, to which RPHI replied. See Doc. Nos. 11, 12. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.