Langer
Langer v. Nenow
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Chris Langer, Case No.: 18-cv-01670-GPC-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND
DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S
Nancy L. Nenow and Does 1-10,
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
Defendants. JUDGMENT AS MOOT.
16 [ECF No. 16, 18.] 17 Before the Court are two motions. First, Defendants1 have filed a motion to 18 dismiss Plaintiff’s first cause of action arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 19 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., as moot and to dismiss Plaintiff’s second cause of action 20 arising under California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–53, for lack of 21 supplemental jurisdiction. (ECF No. 18.) Second, Plaintiff has filed motion for summary 22 judgment on both causes of action. (ECF No. 16.) 23
25 1 W.K.S. Frosty Corporation (“WKS”), as Defendant Nancy L. Nenow’s lessee, attests that it is responsible to maintain the Restaurant and its property, and to indemnify Defendant Nenow in litigation.…