Emrit
Emrit v. National Football League
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Case No. 20-cv-00062-BAS-LL 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: 12 v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, FORMA PAUPERIS [ECF No. 2]; WASHINGTON REDSKINS,
DANIEL SNYDER, AND
15 Defendants. (2) DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 17 On January 8, 2020, Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit, proceeding pro se, filed a civil Complaint and moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Compl., ECF No. 1; Mot. for IFP, ECF No. 2.) For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for IFP and DISMISSES this action with prejudice. I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a litigant who because of indigency is unable to pay the required fees or security to commence a legal action may petition the court to proceed without making such payment. See Moore v. Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, 657 F.3d…