Rosales

Rosales v. Pandora's Pizza, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20203:18-cv-02326California1,604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OMAR ROSALES, Case No.: 18-CV-2326 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff, ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT;

v. (2) DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS

PANDORA’S PIZZA, INC., ELECTRONICALLY; AND (3) FOR

PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendant. WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

STANDING 17 (ECF Nos. 5, 8)

19 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Omar Rosales’ Motion for Default Judgment (“Mot.,” ECF No. 8), and Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Documents Electronically (ECF No. 5). Defendant Pandora’s Pizza, Inc., located in Encinitas California, has not pled or otherwise defended this action. See generally Docket. Having considered Plaintiff’s arguments and the law, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motions. The Court also ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for lack of standing. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.