Ewing

Ewing v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20203:19-cv-00855California2,907 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ANTON EWING, Case No.: 19-CV-855-CAB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT

AND DISMISSING CASE

MARK POLLARD,

Defendant. [Doc. Nos. 24, 31] 17 18 On October 30, 2019, pro se Defendant Mark Pollard filed a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. Because the motion and reply included evidence outside the pleadings, on December 4, 2019, the Court entered an order converting the motion to be for summary judgment and gave both parties an opportunity to present all relevant evidence. Separately, Plaintiff Anton Ewing has filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Briefing is now complete on both motions, and the Court deems them suitable for submission without oral argument. As discussed below, Ewing’s motion is denied, and Pollard’s motion is granted. 27 28 I. Background Serial litigant1 Anton Ewing, pro se,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.