Sekerke
Sekerke v. Leo
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20203:19-cv-00034California6,334 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE, Case No.: 3:19-cv-0034-GPC-RBB Booking No. 18165284,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S vs. MOTION TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ECF No. 35];
ARTURO LEO; MARK O’BRIEN;
SHERIFF WILLIAM GORE, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
Defendants. QUASH [ECF No. 45];
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND
EMERGENCY INJUNCTION
[ECF No. 47].
22 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a Second Amended 23 Complaint (“SAC”). ECF No. 35. Defendant Sheriff William Gore (“Gore”) filed an 24 opposition on January 2, 2020. ECF No. 42.1 25
27 1 The Court issued a briefing schedule on November 27, 2019 noting that no reply would be permitted. 28 Additionally, before the Court are Specially Appearing…