Sekerke

Sekerke v. Leo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20203:19-cv-00034California6,334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE, Case No.: 3:19-cv-0034-GPC-RBB Booking No. 18165284,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S vs. MOTION TO FILE SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

[ECF No. 35];

ARTURO LEO; MARK O’BRIEN;

SHERIFF WILLIAM GORE, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Defendants. QUASH [ECF No. 45];

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND

EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

[ECF No. 47].

22 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a Second Amended 23 Complaint (“SAC”). ECF No. 35. Defendant Sheriff William Gore (“Gore”) filed an 24 opposition on January 2, 2020. ECF No. 42.1 25

27 1 The Court issued a briefing schedule on November 27, 2019 noting that no reply would be permitted. 28 Additionally, before the Court are Specially Appearing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.