Quirarte

Quirarte v. United Domestic Workers AFSCME Local 3930

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20203:19-cv-01287California4,974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALICIA QUIRARTE et al., Case No.: 19-CV-1287-CAB-KSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS

v. FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

UNITED DOMESTIC WORKERS

AFSCME LOCAL 3930 et al., 15 [Doc. Nos. 30, 34] Defendants.

17 This matter comes before the Court on the Defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings. [Doc. Nos. 30, 34.] The motions have been fully briefed and the Court finds them suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, the motions are granted. I. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiffs Alicia Quirarte, Nora Maya, Anh Le, Viet Le, and Jose Diaz are In-Home Supportive Service (“IHSS”) providers that provide non-medical assistance services to disabled individuals who qualify for California Medicaid (“Medi-Cal”). [Doc. No. 1 at ¶¶

27 1 The Court is not making any findings of fact, but rather summarizing the relevant allegations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.