Haynes

Haynes v. Juarez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20203:19-cv-02380California3,621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HERMAN T. HAYNES, Case No.: 19-cv-2380-BAS-MSB

CDCR #J-69292,

(1) GRANTING MOTION TO Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [ECF No. 2]; v. (2) DISMISSING FOURTEENTH

JUAREZ; A. AGUIRRE; H. ASBURY; AMENDMENT CLAIMS;

A. SHEPARD; P. BRACAMONTE; M.

BELMARES; TORRES, AND

16 Defendants. (3) DISMISSING DEFENDANTS JUAREZ, AGUIRRE,

BRACAMONTE, AND BELMARES

18 19 Herman T. Haynes (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at 20 Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”) located in Ione, California, has filed a Complaint 21 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 1), together with a Motion to Proceed In Forma 22 Pauperis (“Motion for IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff claims prison officials at Richard J. 23 Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, violated his Fourteenth 24 and Eighth Amendment rights when he was previously…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.