Carroll

Carroll v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20203:20-cv-00010California1,000 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TREMAYNE CARROLL, Case No.: 20-cv-0010-BAS-BGS Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

AMENDED PETITION WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE

POLLARD, Warden, STATE OF [ECF No. 5] CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 On January 2, 2020, Petitioner, a state prisoner incarcerated at the R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 2 8 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). (ECF No. 1.) On January 16, 2020, the Court dismissed the Petition without prejudice for failure to state a cognizable claim because Petitioner failed to allege that success on the claims presented, which included the restoration of custody credits lost through prison disciplinary actions, would have necessarily impacted the length of his confinement. (Order, ECF No. 4.) Petitioner was instructed that if he “wishes to challenge the loss of time or credits affecting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.