Spatcher

Spatcher v. City of Oceanside

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20203:19-cv-02281California900 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY LEON SPATCHER, Case No.: 3:19-cv-2281-JAH-RBM

CDCR #BJ-9222,

ORDER: (1) DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § vs. 1915A(b)(1); AND (2) DENYING

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AS MOOT

CITY OF OCEANSIDE; BEATRIZ

GONZALES; JEFFREY BRANDT,

Defendants. 18 19 20 21 Gregory Leon Spatcher (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at the California Institution for Men (“CIM”) in Chino, California and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1). Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). / / / I. Sua Sponte Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.