Spatcher
Spatcher v. City of Oceanside
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY LEON SPATCHER, Case No.: 3:19-cv-2281-JAH-RBM
CDCR #BJ-9222,
ORDER: (1) DISMISSING CIVIL
Plaintiff, ACTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § vs. 1915A(b)(1); AND (2) DENYING
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS AS MOOT
CITY OF OCEANSIDE; BEATRIZ
GONZALES; JEFFREY BRANDT,
Defendants. 18 19 20 21 Gregory Leon Spatcher (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at the California Institution for Men (“CIM”) in Chino, California and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1). Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). / / / I. Sua Sponte Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C.…