Gallegos
Gallegos v. Seeley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEJANDRO GALLEGOS, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01322-JAH-MSB
CDCR #T-63165,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
Plaintiff, SEELEY’S MOTION FOR vs. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PURSUANT TO
K. SEELEY, M..D.,
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Defendant. 16 [ECF No. 32] 17 18 Currently before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 by Defendant K. Seeley (“Seeley”) (ECF No. 32). After he was notified of the requirements for opposing summary pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 34), Plaintiff filed his Opposition (“Opp’n”) (ECF No. 736). Seeley has filed his Reply. (ECF No. 37.) While the Motion was initially calendared before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg, the Court has determined that this Motion is suitable for disposition upon the papers without oral argument and that no Report and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Berg is necessary.…