Primacy Engineering, Inc. v. ITE, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20203:18-cv-01781California613 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRIMACY ENGINEERING, INC., a Case No.: 3:18-cv-01781-GPC-MDD New Jersey Corporation,

ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION

Plaintiff, TO VACATE PRIOR ORDERS. v. (ECF No. 63.) ITE, INC., a Virginia Corporation; ISPA TECHNOLOGY, LLC, a Virginia 16 Limited Liability Company; TED RAITCH, an individual; CHRISTIAN S. BROWN, an individual; and DOES 1-100, 18 Defendants. 19 20 On January 4, 2019, the Court granted in part and deferred in part Defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees and denied Defendants’ motion to amend the Court’s prior orders and judgment. (ECF No. 45.) Then, on May 9, 2019, the Court denied Primacy’s motion for reconsideration and granted Defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees. (ECF No. 58.) The Parties now move jointly to vacate these Orders.1 (ECF No. 63.) 26 27 The Parties’ motion does not offer any case or authority for the Court to vacate prior orders, and provides no justification for vacating the subject orders other than a cursory reference to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.