Holmes
Holmes v. Estock
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CHARLES HOLMES, Case No. 3:16-cv-02458-MMA-BLM
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S EX
v. PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME
ESTOCK, et al.,
Defendants. [Doc. No. 111] 14 15 Plaintiff Charles Holmes, a California inmate, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care. Plaintiff, proceeding through counsel, has filed a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) against Defendants. See Doc. No. 81. Defendants move for summary judgment as to all claims. See Doc. No. 96. To date, for reasons set forth in an order issued by the Court on January 29, 2020, see Doc. No. 110, Plaintiff has not filed a response in opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment despite being granted multiple extensions of time in which to do so. See Doc. Nos. 100, 102, 110. Plaintiff now moves for an additional extension of time in which…