Coffin

Coffin v. MAGELLAN HRSC, INC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20203:19-cv-02047California3,752 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 CHRISTIE COFFIN, on behalf of Case No. 19-cv-2047-BAS-NLS herself and all other aggrieved employees, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO Plaintiff, REMAND 14 v. [ECF No. 16]

MAGELLAN HRSC, INC.,

16 Defendant. 17 18 In September 2019, Plaintiff Christie Coffin filed a complaint against Defendant Magellan HRSC, Inc. in California state court. (ECF No. 1-3.) The complaint alleges violations of the California Private Attorney General’s Act, California Labor Code sections 2689 et seq. Magellan removed the case to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Plaintiff now moves for remand. (“Mot.,” ECF No. 16.) Magellan filed an opposition to the Motion, (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 26), to which Plaintiff replied, (“Reply, ECF No. 28). The Court finds this Motion suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court I. PLAINTIFF’S FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.