Torres

Torres v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20203:19-cv-01964California4,181 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDUARDO TORRES, Case No.: 19-cv-01964-LAB-JLB

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

v. MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS

RALPH DIAZ, et al.,

Respondents. [ECF Nos. 2; 3; 4; 5; 13; 18] 16 Petitioner Eduardo Torres is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF Nos. 1; 9.) Presently before the Court are several miscellaneous motions filed by Petitioner: (1) Request for Evidentiary Hearing (ECF No. 5); (2) Request for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 2); (3) Request for Provision of Missing/Withheld State Court Discovery (ECF No. 3); (4) Request for Expansion of the Record (ECF No. 4); (5) “In- Camera Request for Court to Expedite its Ruling on the Companion Motions/Requests Filed Simultaneously with Petitioner[’s] Pro Se[] Federal Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (ECF No. 13); and (6) “Request to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.