Ramirez
Ramirez v. Zimmerman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAIRO CERVANTES RAMIREZ, et Lead Case No.: 17-cv-1230-BAS-AHG al., Consolidated with: 18-cv-1062-BAS-AHG
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. RULE 37 SANCTIONS
SAN DIEGO POLICE CHIEF
15 SHELLY ZIMMERMAN, et al., [ECF No. 128] 16 Defendants.
18 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Rule 37 Motion. ECF No. 128. 19 Plaintiff seeks sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure against all 20 Defendants for various alleged discovery violations under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 26. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is DENIED.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
23 The factual background of this case has been set forth in numerous prior orders and 24 will thus not be exhaustively rehashed herein. See, e.g., ECF No. 85 at 1-3. Relevant to the 25 present Order, this case arises from a May 27, 2016 rally at the San Diego Convention 26 Center for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump (“the rally”), …