Wright

Wright v. Old Gringo, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20203:17-cv-01996California3,447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARSHA WRIGHT, Case No.: 17cv1996-BAS (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO OLD GRINGO, INC., et al.,

EXCLUDE PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT

Defendants. TESTIMONY AND REPORT [ECF NO. 231]; AND

(2) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS

TO FILE UNDER SEAL

18 [ECF NOS. 230, 234] 19 Presently before the Court is Defendant’s “Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s Expert Testimony and Report” (“Instant Motion”), filed by Defendant on January 24, 2020. (ECF No. 2231 (sealed version), ECF No. 231 (redacted).) Plaintiff filed her opposition to the motion on January 31, 2020. (ECF No. 232.) Defendants’ Instant Motion asks the Court to exclude the December 20, 2019 supplemental report of Plaintiff’s expert, Joshua Vanetti, pursuant to Federal Rule of

27 August 17, 2018 deadline. In opposition, Plaintiff argues that her expert reports were not untimely, and even if they were, any delay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.