Venson

Venson v. Jackson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20203:18-cv-02278California2,478 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No.: 18CV2278-BAS (BLM) CLIFFORD ALLAN VENSON,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR EXPERT WITNESS AND

v. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

SERGEANT Q. JACKSON, et al., [ECF Nos. 73, 75, 78, AND 80] Defendants. 15 16 17 I. MOTIONS FOR EXPERT WITNESSES Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motions for Expert Witness [ECF Nos. 73, 75, and 78], Defendants A. Diaz, Q. Jackson, and J. Knight’s opposition to the motions [ECF No. 82], and Defendant R. Hernandez’s Joinder to Defendants’ opposition [ECF No. 83]. Having considered all of the briefing and supporting documents, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motions for Expert Witness. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On October 28, 2019, Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding and , filed a Second Amended Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three correctional officers and one sergeant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.