Meier

Meier v. Allied Interstate, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20203:18-cv-01562California7,351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD MEIER, Case No.: 18-CV-1562-GPC-BGS Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC, JUDGMENT AND DENYING

14 Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT.

16 (ECF Nos. 24, 25.) 17 Richard J. Meier (“Plaintiff”), representing himself, has brought this action alleging that Allied Interstate, LLC, (“Defendant” or “Allied”) contacted his cellphone using an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”) in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (“TCPA”). (ECF No. 1, Complaint.) Allied admits contacting Plaintiff but denies doing so using an ATDS. (ECF No. 4, Answer.) On June 6, 2019, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff responded on June 21, 2019, (ECF No. 29), and Defendant replied on June 27, 2019. (ECF No. 30.) Acting in parallel, Plaintiff filed a motion for partial summary 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.